Home/Medical Review Process
Trust & Transparency

Medical Review Process

Every scientific article in the Knowledge Centre is checked by a qualified reviewer before it goes live.

Last updated: July 2026

Why we review

Peptide pharmacology is nuanced, and small inaccuracies can mislead. Independent review is how we keep the Knowledge Centre trustworthy — a second, qualified set of eyes confirms that each article reflects the current evidence and stays within a research-use framing.

Who reviews our content

Reviewers hold advanced degrees in pharmacology, biochemistry, endocrinology or a related life science. They assess scientific accuracy, the strength of the cited evidence, and whether any statement could be read as human medical advice — which is never our intent.

The review workflow

  • Draft — written from primary sources by a science writer
  • Science edit — claims checked line-by-line against citations
  • Medical review — a qualified reviewer signs off on accuracy and framing
  • Publish — the reviewer and review date are recorded on the article

Review cadence

Reviewed articles are re-checked periodically and whenever significant new literature appears. The date shown on an article reflects its most recent verified review, not merely its first publication.

Flagging a concern

Spotted something that looks wrong or out of date? We want to know. Use the Contact page and our editorial team will route it to the appropriate reviewer.